As I am on the subject, it can be hard to assess exactly what the problem
is with remote graphics.
Remember that a squeaky wheel gets more attention.
I was involved with one link to a site in Europe which was using CAD
remotely. I really was never sure whether or not the users
were just unhappy that they had to work in a different way, or that they
were really frustrated by the latency they experienced.
A good solution would have been to have my fly out and sit beside the
users, but this was not on the cards.
I did have several sessions on the phone, watching bandwidth usage and
counters as the users rotated their models.
One telling story is that I did one day get reports of the remote access
being almost unuseable. A lot of flood pings and traceroutes later I proved
that the network link was dropping a huge percentageof packets and the
network provider switches the circuit over...
There are such things as WAN emulators, which introduce delay and packet
loss into links. If I was to do work like this again I would set up a
WAN emulator in the lab first and see what the quality of the experience is
before installing a solution at the remote end.
Time spent here will be well repaid
http://wanbully.com/home/tools/wan-emulation/
Makes me think. 1st workshop. Canât ever be the first time this
question has been asked. Also David, absolutely not OT. Very much on topic.
Maybe...
For my contribution if you use Windows then MobaXterm is an excellent
tool. IT wraps up Putty, VNC, Cygwin X server etc. etc in one package.
VirtualGL - to be honest I dint think much of this. Hard to set up, and
you had to 'vglrun application'. I know this can be a wrapper.
To be fair, one place where I worked really favoured it.
NICE DCV - absolutely simple to set up, works great and is transparent to
users. You can enable and disable it easily also.
Teradici PCOIP - I used the hardware version of PCOIP with cards in
workstations and zero (thin) clients on desks.
Works great. Completely transparent to users. If you are working in a
secure environment then you should really, really look at this.
I had one customer who was working at a UK secure site. He had a cluster
room, and a small room next door with Windows PCs.
He would have to walk over to work on the PCs as they were not connected
to his office network.
First time I visited the site I recommended Teradici and they were a great
success - the card/terminals have options for fibre connections
which are again used on many secure sites.
I miss SGI jot. It had this super strange GL offload to the client that
Iâve never seen since.
http://rainbow.ldeo.columbia.edu/documentation/sgi-faq/apps/6.html
We really need to find a solid way to do this whole remote GUI work.
https://2018.isc-program.com/?page_id=10&id=wksp122&sess=sess279
Makes me think. 1st workshop. Canât ever be the first time this question
has been asked. Also David, absolutely not OT. Very much on topic.
J.
Off Topic.
I need to do some work on a system 3000 miles away. No problem
connecting to it with ssh or setting X11 forwarding, but the delays are
such that my usual editor (nedit) spends far too much time redrawing to
be useful. Resizing a screen is particularly painful.
Are there any X11 GUI editors that are less sensitive to these issues?
If not I will just use nano or vim.
Thanks,
David Mathog
Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
_______________________________________________
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
--
--
Dr. James Cuff
The Next Platform
https://www.nextplatform.com/author/jamescuff/
https://linkedin.com/in/jamesdotcuff
https://twitter.com/jamesdotcuff
_______________________________________________
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf