ATM⊠I remember it well- it was going to be: â100 Mbps + to the desktop!â so you donât have rely on an ISDN PRI or a 10Mbps ethernet.
The next step past ISDN (âIt still doesnât networkâ) although I had a BRI to my apartment, then house, for several years. We had ISDN phones at JPL for a number of years, and now weâre all Cisco VOIP phones â heck, the astronauts on ISS call home on a unmodified Cisco VOIP phone. I guess Cisco was more motivated to deliver a âsolve everyoneâs problemsâ solution than the fractious baby bells.
I remember well ATMâs short packets (so you donât need echo suppressors within continental France) â compared to 100Mbps Ethernet Jumbo frames that became pervasive, and now weâre GigE to the desktop.
Silicon is wonderful â you can make adaptive equalizers that figure out and compensate for all the impedance discontinuities getting from chip to board to connector to cable etc. If you had asked me, in 1985 as an RF /DSP kind of guy, will we send many Gbps over twisted pair for a few dollars/port I would have said that would be quite a feat.
From: Beowulf <beowulf-***@beowulf.org> on behalf of "***@beowulf.org" <***@beowulf.org>
Reply-To: John Hearns <***@googlemail.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 10:32 PM
To: "***@beowulf.org" <***@beowulf.org>
Subject: Re: [Beowulf] FPGA storage accelerator
Itâs so interesting to look at what was old being new again though. Lovely insight as always Joe!
Indeed. Ideas always come around again in computing.
My aphorism - always follow the herd. Look at what everyone is buying an implementing.
Don't delve too deeply into the technical minutae of a particular technology which takes your interest.
For if you don't follow the herd it will trample you.
(Speakign as someone who was an expert in ATM networking, long since left lying flattened on the plains)
On 7 June 2018 at 03:58, James Cuff <***@nextplatform.com<mailto:***@nextplatform.com>> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:43 PM Joe Landman <***@gmail.com<mailto:***@gmail.com>> wrote:
Ha! "Then maybe, just maybe, perhaps 640 PB ought to be enough. Maybe."
Thanks for spotting that. I really am trying. Peebees :-)
Itâs so interesting to look at what was old being new again though. Lovely insight as always Joe!
Back in 2005 or so, we had these little USB connected FPGA
Yep!
--
--
Dr. James Cuff
The Next Platform
https://www.nextplatform.com/author/jamescuff/
https://linkedin.com/in/jamesdotcuff
https://twitter.com/jamesdotcuff
_______________________________________________
Beowulf mailing list, ***@beowulf.org<mailto:***@beowulf.org> sponsored by Penguin Computing
To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf